As part of my obsession with motorcycles I often find myself perusing manufacturers’ websites, muttering: “I want to ride that one, and that one, and that one, and…”

RELATED: Ask TMO: Am I Ready for a Long-Distance Ride?

Doing this on Honda’s UK website the other day I happened to notice something that I hadn’t heard mentioned anywhere: the Honda VFR1200F has been dropped from the line-up. I thought perhaps it might just be a reflection of UK market tastes, so I checked Honda’s Spain site – no, la motocicleta no está allí. To be certain, I jumped over to Big Red’s US site, and, sure enough, the bike Wes Siler once referred to as “Shamu” is gone from there, as well.

I personally feel the VFR1200F is/was one of the most beautiful bikes ever made. The quality of its fit and finish was so far beyond anything else that Honda makes. It was one of the very, very, very few Japanese bikes that I could just sit and stare at, happily taking in every little detail. Sadly, I never got a chance to ride a VFR1200F, and now it looks like I never will.

I would have thought the sport-touring genre would be one that Honda would be happy to dominate

Meanwhile, a bike that I feel Honda probably should drop hangs on: the ST1300, aka Pan-European. The stalwart machine is still just sitting there in the line-up, looking and performing almost exactly the same as when first introduced some 17 years ago. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a fan of the Pan. It’s another bike I’ve not had the pleasure to ride, but every owner I’ve met speaks highly of the machine and clocks up huge miles on the thing. Still, it’s pretty long in the tooth – I mean, really long in the tooth – and expecting anyone to pay £15,000 for a new one is laughable.

The VFR800F, meanwhile hangs on, and maybe there’s an argument to be made that Honda is re-imagining the genre with its new lighter, slicker Gold Wing, but by and large it seems the company has abandoned the sport tourer.

2018 GL1800 Goldwing
The new Gold Wing is a sexier proposition than the Wings of old, but is it truly a sport tourer?

I guess you could say that’s an overall industry trend. And perhaps one that makes sense. The adventure-sport category – bikes like the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT (a bike that KTM actually refers to as a sport tourer) or the under-appreciated Triumph Tiger Sport – have more or less filled the space previously occupied by sport tourers. And for a guy who’s 6-foot-1, these adventure-sport bikes are more comfortable than the sportbike-emulating machines of old.

But not everyone is my height nor as inflexible as me, and for those folks most manufacturers have kept a toe in the sport-touring pool. Yamaha overhauled the FJR1300 not too long ago, Kawasaki has also kept its GTR1400 from getting too old, BMW is finding all kinds of ways to expand the appeal of its K1600 platform, Ducati introduced its SuperSport only last year, and Suzuki – well, if rumors are to be believed and you buy the idea that the GSX1300R can easily lend itself to touring – is on the verge of rolling out a completely overhauled Hayabusa.

READ MORE: 2017 Kawasaki GTR1400 (Concours 14) – Ride Review

But Honda, it seems, isn’t keen. I find that interesting. I would have thought the sport-touring genre would be one that Honda would be happy to dominate, since many of the factors that define the genre also happen to define most of Honda’s large-capacity line-up: reasonably fast bikes that can be ridden really far.

Honda VFR1200F
Come to think of it, it does look a little bit like Shamu…

This makes me wonder how Honda sees itself – how it wants to see itself, and how it wants others to see it. There’s long been a quiet conversation in moto-journalism circles that the company doesn’t seem entirely happy with what it is at the moment, but that it seems equally unwilling to explore what else it could be. To some extent, it’s like a well-grounded middle-aged man – feeling the pangs of a mid-life crisis but equally unwilling to give in.

Whatever Honda is thinking, I have to admit I’m a little sad the VFR1200F won’t be a part of its future plans. Though, perhaps it is telling that I never found time to actually ride one.


Discover more from Dancing the Polka

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

This article may contain affiliate links via Amazon Associates, Skimlinks, or Aerostich. These links are included to make it easier for you to learn more about the products mentioned and, you know, buy them if so inclined. In all cases, I receive a (very) small commission if you purchase something, but that doesn’t affect the price you pay. Hopefully you know this site well enough to know that this commission also doesn’t affect any of my editorial choices. If I say that I like something, it’s because I actually like it.

6 responses to “Has Honda Given Up on the Sport Tourer?”

  1. I admit I am in the market for a sport touring bike. While I don’t expect the minister of war and finance to approve that capital equipment purchase anytime soon, I think a lightweight sport touring bike would accent the Scrambler quite well. To say that I am jealous of your access to the elusive Tiger Sport would be an understatement. Fortunately, there are quite a few late model Tiger 1050s available on this side of the pond, but that 2013 and new Tigers are much more refined.

    Besides my banter about loving the Tiger, I’m concerned about what is happening to the sport touring market with the advent of the heavy weight adventure bikes. In my mind, a perfect motorcycle stable has something like a Tiger 800 as a daily rider, and something on the magnitude of the FJR or Trophy as the long-haul machine (the Trophy and the Sprint are both gone from the US now). I’ll tour on a Scrambler, so certainly I’ll tour on a Tiger Explorer, but if you already have a similar tool in the garage, I think there’s something to be said for the VFR1200, et al.

    1. I think the thing is that a bike like the Tiger 1200 (or R 1200 GS if sir prefers) is enough like both a Tiger 800 and an FJR1300 that you only need to own one bike. In a world of shrinking middle class, single bike ownership may be the best that most people can manage.

      1. I resemble that remark… at least for now.

        I can’t argue your point. I see the 1200 as a big step up considering weight and shaft drive; but for folks that do not ride off-road, agreed. Without publishing a list of bikes, I think I would be quite happy with an 800 XRx as a touring bike. Of course, then I start debating the F800GT… but I digress.

      2. The weight of the Explorer is such that only a fool would attempt to off road with it. The Tiger 800 is a fine bike. I rode one to the Isle of Sky back in November and found myself wondering whether I really need the extra weight and power (and cost) of my Explorer.

      3. I’ve ridden all of the Tigers except the steamer and the 1200 at this point. I spent a few miles on the Trophy 1200, I imagine the TEx is even more capable. Short of finding an insane deal on an FJ-09, it’s very likely that a Tiger of one variety or another is going to come home to live with my Scrambler. The Scram is a fantastic commuter, it’s easy to work on, and reasonable adventure bike, but it’s lacking most in the touring category IMHO; thus I want something I can “hyper-mile” out west and south when I feel like it.

  2. These VFR1200 are a great bike, a bit bland in my view, but do everything really well. I think their biggest problem was the level of tech they had put the bike in a too high price bracket for what it was.

Leave a Reply to zed14Cancel reply

Most Recent

Discover more from Dancing the Polka

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading